null
Grain Dryer Types for Corn Farming Operations

Grain Dryer Types for Corn Farming Operations

Published by The Grain Handling Direct Team - Powered by AI on Apr 25th 2025

This comprehensive analysis examines the strengths and weaknesses of four major types of grain dryers in agriculture: mixed flow dryers, portable grain dryers, in-bin drying systems, and tower dryers. The analysis focuses specifically on their suitability for corn farming operations in the Upper Midwest climate of the United States and Canada, with particular emphasis on energy efficiency, cost considerations, and maintenance requirements.

Each dryer type offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, with their optimal application varying based on operation size, financial considerations, existing infrastructure, management style, and local support availability. This document provides corn farmers with the information needed to make informed decisions about which grain drying system provides the best value for their specific operations.

Introduction and Methodology

This analysis was conducted through extensive research of technical specifications, manufacturer information, agricultural extension publications, and real-world user experiences. The research methodology included:

  1. Detailed examination of operational principles for each dryer type
  2. Analysis of energy efficiency factors and performance metrics
  3. Evaluation of initial investment and operating costs
  4. Assessment of maintenance requirements and brand performance differences
  5. Collection of user feedback from farming forums and social media
  6. Comparative analysis across multiple factors relevant to corn farming in the Upper Midwest

The findings are presented in a structured format that allows for direct comparison between dryer types while acknowledging that the "best" solution depends on the specific circumstances of each farming operation.

Decision Framework for Farmers

When selecting among grain dryer types, farmers should consider the following factors:

Operation Size

  • Small operations (<50,000 bushels annually): Consider portable dryers or in-bin systems.
  • Medium operations (50,000-150,000 bushels): Consider mixed flow dryers, Shivvers systems, or multiple in-bin systems.
  • Large operations (>150,000 bushels): Consider tower dryers or multiple mixed flow dryers.

Financial Considerations

  • Limited capital: Portable dryers or conventional in-bin systems offer lowest initial investment.
  • Focus on operating costs: In-bin systems (conventional or Shivvers) offer lowest long-term operating costs.
  • Return on investment: Consider service life and resale value; mixed flow and tower dryers typically maintain value better.

Existing Infrastructure

  • Limited electrical service: Portable dryers may be preferable as they often require less electrical capacity.
  • Existing bins: Adding in-bin drying capability to existing grain storage systems may be cost-effective.
  • Limited space: Tower dryers offer maximum capacity in minimal footprint.

Management Style

  • Hands-on operators: May prefer the simplicity of portable or in-bin systems.
  • Technology-focused: May prefer the automation of mixed flow, Shivvers, or tower dryers.
  • Risk-averse: May prefer the weather independence of high-capacity systems like tower or mixed flow dryers.

Local Support

  • Dealer proximity: Consider local dealer support for parts and service.
  • Brand prevalence: More common brands in the region typically have better parts availability.
  • Service technicians: Availability of qualified service technicians for more complex systems.

Dryer Type 1: Mixed Flow Grain Dryers

General Principles and Operation

Mixed flow dryers represent a significant advancement in grain drying technology, combining elements of cross-flow and concurrent-flow designs. In these systems, grain flows vertically downward through the dryer while air moves both horizontally and vertically through the grain column in a mixed-flow pattern.

The key operational components include:

  • A series of alternating air supply and exhaust ducts arranged to create a mixed airflow.
  • Grain columns typically 12-16 inches thick for optimal air penetration.
  • Metering rolls at the bottom to control grain flow rate.
  • Multiple heating zones with independent temperature control.
  • Cooling section in the lower portion of many models.

The mixed airflow pattern ensures more uniform moisture removal and reduced thermal stress. This allows for higher drying temperatures without compromising grain quality.

Energy Efficiency Factors

  • Multiple air passes: The mixed flow pattern extracts more moisture per unit of energy.
  • Heat recovery systems: Modern units capture and reuse heat from the cooling section.

Mixed flow dryers typically use 1,600-2,200 BTU per pound of water removed, representing a 15-25% improvement over conventional designs.

Cost Considerations

Initial Investment

  • Small to medium capacity (500-1,000 bu/hr): $75,000-$200,000
  • Medium to large capacity (1,000-3,000 bu/hr): $200,000-$400,000
  • Large capacity (3,000+ bu/hr): $400,000-$500,000+

Note: Costs exclude site prep, electrical, or grain handling equipment.

Operating Costs

  • Fuel (propane): $0.015-0.025 per bushel per point of moisture.
  • Electricity: $0.005-0.010 per bushel per point of moisture.
  • Maintenance: Approx. 2-3% of initial investment annually.

Dryer Type 2: Portable Grain Dryers

General Principles and Operation

Portable grain dryers are self-contained units designed for mobility. They typically operate as batch dryers, though some offer continuous flow. They are trailer-mounted and include built-in loading/unloading augers.

Energy Efficiency & Costs

Portable dryers generally have lower efficiency due to single-pass airflow and higher heat loss. Initial investment for small units starts around $20,000, reaching $150,000 for large-capacity models.

Dryer Type 3: In-Bin Drying Systems

In-bin systems dry grain within the storage structure using perforated floors and fans. This includes natural-air, low-temperature, and specialized Shivvers Counter-Flow systems.

Shivvers In-Bin Drying Systems

Unlike traditional static in-bin systems, Shivvers uses counter-flow technology where grain flows downward while heated air moves upward. This provides faster drying and better energy utilization.

  • Energy Efficiency: Reported fuel savings of 30-40% compared to high-temperature dryers.
  • System Options: Includes the Circu-Lator for precision/recirculation and Dri-Flo for high-capacity integration (up to 2,500 bu/hr).

Advantages and Disadvantages for Corn Drying

  1. Energy efficiency: Uses 30-50% less energy per bushel compared to high-temperature drying.
  2. Better grain quality: Slower drying produces fewer stress cracks and less breakage.
  3. Lower operational complexity: Simplifies the transition from drying to long-term storage.

Comparative Analysis

Energy Efficiency Comparison

Energy efficiency is typically measured in BTU per pound of water removed or fuel usage per bushel per point of moisture removed:
Dryer Type
BTU/lb Water Removed
Propane (gal/bu/point)
Electricity (kWh/bu/point)
Mixed Flow
1,600-2,200
0.015-0.025
0.005-0.010
Portable
1,800-2,500
0.018-0.030
0.003-0.008
In-Bin
1,000-1,500
0.000-0.015*
0.010-0.015
Shivvers
1,400-1,800
0.014-0.020
0.008-0.012
Tower
1,400-1,800
0.014-0.022
0.004-0.008
*Natural-air systems use no propane; low-temperature systems use minimal amounts
In-bin drying systems are generally the most energy-efficient, followed by tower dryers and mixed flow dryers, with portable dryers typically being the least efficient. However, the trade-off is drying speed, with in-bin systems taking significantly longer than the other types.

Initial Investment Comparison

Initial investment varies significantly by dryer type and capacity:
Dryer Type
Small Operation (<50k bu/yr)
Medium Operation (50-150k bu/yr)
Large Operation (>150k bu/yr)
Mixed Flow
$75,000-$200,000
$200,000-$400,000
$400,000-$500,000+
Portable
$20,000-$50,000
$50,000-$100,000
$100,000-$150,000
In-Bin
$30,000-$100,000
$100,000-$200,000
$200,000+
Shivvers
$50,000-$150,000
$150,000-$300,000
$300,000+
Tower
$150,000-$400,000
$400,000-$700,000
$700,000-$1,000,000+
Portable dryers offer the lowest initial investment, followed by conventional in-bin systems, Shivvers systems, mixed flow dryers, and tower dryers. However, when considering the dual-purpose nature of in-bin systems (drying and storage), their effective cost may be lower.

Capacity Comparison

Drying capacity varies significantly by dryer type:
Dryer Type
Typical Capacity Range (bu/hr)
Capacity per $ Invested
Mixed Flow
500-5,000
Medium
Portable
100-1,200
High
In-Bin
100-1,000*
Low
Shivvers
500-2,500
Medium
Tower
1,000-10,000
Medium
*In-bin capacity is highly dependent on ambient conditions and moisture removal required
Tower dryers offer the highest absolute capacity, followed by mixed flow dryers, Shivvers systems, portable dryers, and conventional in-bin systems. However, when considering capacity per dollar invested, portable dryers often provide the highest throughput relative to investment.

Grain Quality Comparison

Grain quality is affected by drying method, with gentler drying generally producing better quality:
Dryer Type
Stress Cracks
Breakage
Test Weight
Overall Quality
Mixed Flow
Low
Low
Excellent
Excellent
Portable
Moderate
Moderate
Good
Good
In-Bin
Very Low
Very Low
Excellent
Excellent
Shivvers
Low
Low
Excellent
Excellent
Tower
Low-Moderate
Low
Very Good
Very Good
In-bin systems (both conventional and Shivvers) and mixed flow dryers generally produce the highest quality grain with minimal stress cracks and breakage, followed by tower dryers and portable dryers.

Maintenance and Labor Requirements

Maintenance and labor needs vary by dryer type:
Dryer Type
Maintenance Complexity
Annual Maintenance Cost
Labor Hours per Day
Technical Knowledge Required
Mixed Flow
Moderate-High
2-3% of investment
0.5-1
Moderate-High
Portable
Low-Moderate
3-5% of investment
1-2
Low-Moderate
In-Bin
Low
2-3% of investment
0.5-1
Low-Moderate
Shivvers
Moderate
3-4% of investment
0.5-1
Moderate
Tower
Moderate-High
2-4% of investment
0.5-1
Moderate-High
Conventional in-bin systems generally have the lowest maintenance requirements and technical knowledge needed, followed by portable dryers, Shivvers systems, mixed flow dryers, and tower dryers.

Operation Size Suitability

Different dryer types are better suited to different operation sizes:
Dryer Type
Small Operations (<50k bu/yr)
Medium Operations (50-150k bu/yr)
Large Operations (>150k bu/yr)
Mixed Flow
Poor-Fair
Excellent
Good
Portable
Excellent
Fair
Poor
In-Bin
Excellent
Good
Fair
Shivvers
Good
Excellent
Fair
Tower
Poor
Good
Excellent
Portable dryers and conventional in-bin systems are most suitable for smaller operations, mixed flow dryers and Shivvers systems for medium-sized operations, and tower dryers for large operations.

Conclusion

There is no single "best" type of grain dryer in agriculture. The optimal choice depends on the specific circumstances of each operation, including size, financial considerations, existing infrastructure, management style, and local support availability.

For energy efficiency and grain quality, in-bin systems (both conventional and Shivvers) generally excel. For capacity and weather independence, tower dryers are typically superior. For flexibility and lower initial investment, portable dryers offer advantages. For a balance of efficiency, capacity, and grain quality, mixed flow dryers are often preferred.

By carefully considering the factors outlined in this analysis, corn farmers in the Upper Midwest can make informed decisions about which grain drying system provides the best value for their specific operations.

References

  1. Iowa State University Extension, "Managing High-Moisture Corn"
  2. University of Minnesota Extension, "Natural-Air Corn Drying"
  3. Purdue University Extension, "Comparison of Alternative Grain Drying Systems"
  4. USDA Agricultural Research Service, "Energy Efficiency in Grain Drying"
  5. Sukup Manufacturing Co., Technical Specifications
  6. GSI (Grain Systems Inc.), Product Documentation
  7. Shivvers Manufacturing, System Specifications and Operation Manuals
  8. Farm Progress, "Choosing the Right Grain Dryer"
  9. Successful Farming, "Grain Dryer Buyer's Guide"
  10. AgWeb, "Grain Drying and Storage Costs"
  11. NewAgTalk Forums, User Discussions on Grain Dryer Performance
  12. The Combine Forum, User Feedback on Various Dryer Types
  13. Manufacturer Interviews and Product Demonstrations
  14. On-farm Observations and Operator Interviews